Title of article :
Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Author/Authors :
Attari, Mohammad Ali School of Medicine and Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Mirhosseini, Ahmad School of Medicine - Medicine Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Honarmand, Azim Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Safavi, Mohammad Reza Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Abstract :
BACKGROUND: Either general or regional anesthesia can be used for lumbar disk surgery. The common anesthetic technique
is general anesthesia (GA). The aim of this study was to compare the intra and postoperative outcomes of spinal
anesthesia (SA) with GA in these patients.
METHODS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups with 37 patients in
GA Group and 35 ones in SA Group. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood loss, surgeons satisfaction
with the operating conditions, the severity of postoperative pain based on visual analogue scale (VAS) and analgesic
use were recorded.
RESULTS: The mean blood loss was significantly less in the SA Group compared to GA Group (p < 0.05). Intraoperative
maximum blood pressure and heart rate changes were significantly less in SA Group (p < 0.05). The surgeons satisfaction
was significantly more in the SA Group (p < 0.05). The number of patients who used postoperative analgesic as
well as postoperative mean VAS was significantly less in SA Group in comparison with GA group (p < 0.05 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that SA was superior to GA in providing postoperative analgesia and decreasing
blood loss while maintained better perioperative hemodynamic stability without increasing adverse side effects.
Keywords :
Anesthesia , General, Spinal , Lumbar Surgery
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics