Title of article :
How effective are alprostadil and hydrocortisone on reperfusion injury in kidney after distant organ ischemia?
Author/Authors :
Ebrahimi, Ali Departments of Plastic Surgery - Trauma Research Center - Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Salimi, Fereshteh Departments of Plastic Surgery - Trauma Research Center - Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Safaei, Mansour Departments of Plastic Surgery - Trauma Research Center - Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Melali, Hamid Departments of Plastic Surgery - Trauma Research Center - Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Davarpanah Jazi, Amir Hosein Departments of Plastic Surgery - Trauma Research Center - Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Nematbakhsh, Mehdi Departments of Plastic Surgery - Trauma Research Center - Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mokhtari, Mojgan Department of Pathology - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Rasooli, Hamidreza Departments of Plastic Surgery - Trauma Research Center - Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Background: After reestablishment of blood flow to ischemic limb recirculation of free radicals may cause ischemia-reperfusion
injury in many organs. This study designed to investigate effects of hydrocortisone and alprostadil distant injury to kidneys by both
measuring biochemical markers of oxidative stress and histopathologic examination in an experimental rat model of hind limb
ischemia-reperfusion. Materials and Methods: This study conducted in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences during 2011–2012.
Ischemia was established by infra renal aortic clamping for 60 min in 32 male Wistar rats. Animals were divided into those receiving
alprostadil (group ischemia-reperfusion plus alprostadil (IR/A), n = 8), those receiving hydrocortisone (group ischemia-reperfusion
plus hydrocortisone (IR/H), n = 8), control group (group ischemia-reperfusion (IR), n = 8), and sham group (n = 8). After 120 min of
reperfusion both kidneys were removed. Levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione (GSH) as
indirect markers of oxidative injury was measured. Finally all data in different groups were compared using the analysis of variance
(ANOVA) test by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16. Results: Administration of alprostadil or hydrocortisone
does not improve the biochemical parameters of oxidative injury including MDA and SOD. However, statistically significant difference
was seen in GSH level among sham and IR groups. Mean (± standard deviation (SD)) concentration of GSH in IR, IR/A, IR/H, and
sham groups were 1028.77 (72.65), 924.82 (70.66), 1000.28 (108.77), and 846.69 (163.52), respectively (P = 0.015). Histopathological
study of specimens did not show any significant changes between groups. Conclusion: Alprostadil and hydrocortisone do not improve
the kidney GSH, SOD, and MDA level and kidney releases its GSH reserve during ischemia-reperfusion event, and another point is
that, 3 h of ischemia-reperfusion does not develop injury in kidney.
Keywords :
Alprostadil , hydrocortisone , ischemia-reperfusion injury , oxidative stress
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics