Title of article :
Periprocedural anticoagulation in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Heparin vs bivalirudin
Author/Authors :
Minhas, Abdul Mannan Khan Department of Medicine - Orange Park Medical Center - Terrace - Florida, USA , Assad, Salman Department of Medicine - Shifa Tameer‑e‑Millat University - Islamabad, Pakistan
Abstract :
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
has emerged as an option for patients with severe
aortic stenosis. Placement of Aortic Transcatheter
Valves trial showed similar 2‑year outcomes in
the context of mortality, symptoms reduction,
and improved valve hemodynamics.[1] Currently,
unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the standard of
care for preprocedural anticoagulation during the
TAVR. Another option available for anticoagulation
is bivalirudin which has a shorter half‑life of 25 min
as compared to 1.5 h of UFH but has no reversal
agent available. Previously, many trials have been
conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of
UFH versus bivalirudin in patients who underwent
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The use
of bivalirudin reduced the 30‑day mortality and
net adverse cardiovascular events when compared
to heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in
patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction
who underwent PCI.
Keywords :
Heparin vs bivalirudin , Periprocedural , TAVR
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics