• Title of article

    Which Suction Method is Preferable for Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Open or Closed Endotracheal Suction System?

  • Author/Authors

    Alavi, Mostafa Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Babaei, Touraj Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Shaverdian, Sabaheh Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Norouzi, Zeinab Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Ghadrdoost, Behshid Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Ziyaeifard, Mohsen Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Bakhshandeh, Hooman Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center - Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    51
  • To page
    59
  • Abstract
    Background: There are 2 different methods of suctioning the airway: the open tracheal suction system (OTSS) and the closed tracheal suction system (CTSS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the OTSS and the CTSS in maintaining the stability of hemodynamic and oxygen parameters in patients after cardiac surgery. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients who were under mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery. The study population was randomly divided into the OTSS and CTSS groups. All the patients were at least 18 years old and hemodynamically stable. Hemodynamic parameters such as systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured. Oxygen parameters such as the saturation percentage of arterial blood oxygen (SpO2) and the oxygen pressure of arterial blood (PaO2) were measured before, immediately, and also 3 and 5 minutes after suction. All the parameters were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The mean heart rate, the mean systolic blood pressure, and the mean arterial blood pressure showed a higher increase in the OTSS group (P<0.05), whereas the mean PaO2 and SpO2 were higher in the CTSS group (P<0.05). Conclusions: The CTSS caused fewer disturbances in the hemodynamic and oxygen parameters in comparison with the OTSS in our study population. Therefore, disturbances in the aforementioned parameters can be avoided by using the CTSS in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
  • Keywords
    Airway management , Suction , Cardiac surgical procedures , Hemodynamics
  • Journal title
    Astroparticle Physics
  • Serial Year
    2018
  • Record number

    2441522