Title of article :
Differentiation of Definitive Endoderm from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells on hMSCs Feeder in a Defined Medium
Author/Authors :
Jafarpour, Zahra Department of Biology - Science and Research Branch - Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Yaghmaei, Parichehr Department of Biology - Science and Research Branch - Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Soleimani, Masoud Department of Hematology - Faculty of Medical Science - Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran , Hoseinikhan, Saman Department of biology - Faculty of Medical Science - Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran , Karimi, Mohammadhosein Transplant Research Center - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz , Mobarra, Naser Metabolic Disorders Research Center - Faculty of Medicine - Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan , Geramizadeh, Bita Transplant Research Center - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Abstract :
Background: The Definitive Endoderm (DE) differentiation using the undefined media
and non-human feeders can cause contaminations in the generated cells for therapeutic
applications. Therefore, generating safer and more appropriate DE cells is
needed. This study compared five different methods to establish an appropriate
method for inducing an efficient DE differentiation from Human Induced Pluripotent
Stem Cells (hiPSCs) on an appropriate feeder in a more defined medium.
Methods: Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (hiPSCs) were cultured on inactivated
feeders. Passaged hiPSCs, without feeder, were incubated for three days with
Activin-A and different endodermal differentiation media including 1-FBS, 2-B27, 3-
ITS and albumin fraction-V, 4-B27 and ITS and 5-like the third medium. The feeder
cells in the first four methods were Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts (MEFs) and in the
fifth method were human adult bone marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hMSCs). DE
markers FOXA2, SOX17 and CXCR4 and also pluripotency marker OCT4 were evaluated
using qRT-PCR, as well as FOXA2 by the immunocytochemistry.
Results: QRT-PCR analysis showed that after three days, the expression levels of DE
and pluripotency markers in the differentiated hiPSCs among all five groups did not
have any significant differences. Similarly, the immunocytochemistry analysis demonstrated
that the differentiated hiPSCs expressed FOXA2, with no significant differences.
Conclusion: Despite this similarity in the results, the third differentiation medium has
more defined and cost effective components. Furthermore, hMSC, a human feeder, is
safer than MEF. Therefore, the fifth method is preferable among other DE differentiation
methods and can serve as a fundamental method helping the development of
regenerative medicine.
Keywords :
Endoderm , Induced pluripotent stem cells , Mesenchymal stem cells
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics