Title of article :
Pellet gun injury as a source of ocular trauma; a retrospective review of one hundred and eleven cases
Author/Authors :
Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Soleimani, Mohammad Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Rajabi, Mohammad Bagher Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Ahmadraji, Ali Asghar Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Khodabandeh, Alireza Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Beheshtnejad, Amirhoushang Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tabatabaei, Seyed Mehdi Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Seidi, Reza Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Yaseri, Mehdi Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Purpose: To report the demographic data, treatment methods, and outcomes among patients with pellet gun eye injuries.
Methods: This study was a retrospective review of all pellet gun eye injuries coming to Farabi Eye Hospital, a referral ocular trauma center in
Iran, from February 2009 to November 2013. Patients' demographics, type of injury, choice of management, complications, and post-treatment
visual acuity were recorded.
Results: One hundred eleven patients with a mean age of 25.7 ± 15.6 years entered the study. The most common age group was younger adults
(16e45 years old) (61.3%). The mean uncorrected visual acuity after treatment was 2.05 (20/2240) ±1.5 logMAR. The most prevalent ocular
zone was zone III (38.7%), and an intraocular foreign body was present in 97 patients (87.4%). Lid laceration and periocular tissue damage were
present in 27 patients (24.3%). Lensectomy and vitrectomy were the most common treatment (31.5%). In most patients (87.4%), the injury was
non-deliberate, and the most common time of hospitalization was the same day (45.0%). The only statistically significant indicator of posttreatment
visual acuity was ocular trauma score (OTS) at admission (P < 0.001). At the end of follow-up, enucleation was performed for 20
patients (18%), and thirty-six patients (32%) had no light perception (NLP) in vision.
Conclusion: Pellet gun injuries were more common among young male patients, and the only statistically significant indicator of post-treatment
visual acuity was OTS at admission.
Keywords :
Demographic , Eye , Injury , Pellet gun , Outcome
Journal title :
Journal of Current Ophthalmology
Journal title :
Journal of Current Ophthalmology