Author/Authors :
Shemirani, Hasan Hypertension Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Khosravi, Alireza Hypertension Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Eghbal, Ali Student Research Committee - Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Amirpour, Afshin Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Roghani, Farshad Interventional Cardiology Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Hashemi-Jazi, Mohammad Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Pourmoghaddas, Ali Interventional Cardiology Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Heidari, Ramin Heart Failure Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Sajjadieh, Amir Department of Internal Medicine - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Sadeghi, Nahid Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Sanei, Hamid Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common condition that needs appropriate
treatment like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI)
like eptifibatide prevent procedural ischemic complications after PCI. Eptifibatide has increased
the risk of bleeding complications, although it is effective in reducing mortality and morbidity.
Eptifibatide is routinely used in bolus and infusion forms and the aim of this study is to evaluate
the efficacy of bolus-only dose and bolus + infusion strategy for administrating eptifibatide in
bleeding complications and consequences after PCI.
METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on subjects who experienced PCI after
incidence of myocardial infarction (MI). Patients were randomly divided into two groups who
received bolus-only dose (n = 51) or bolus + infusion form of eptifibatide (n = 50). Then, PCI
blood pressure, mean time duration of hemostasis after arterial sheath removal, laboratory data,
need for blood transfusion, and presence of bleeding complications were evaluated. After
6 months, patients were followed for needs for additional coronary interventions.
RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 61.68 ± 1.50 years. The prevalence of men was 70.29%.
There was no significant difference in mean of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood
pressure (DBP) during hospitalization (P > 0.050). The mean time duration of hemostasis was
8.13 ± 0.45 minutes in the bolus-only group and 16.46 ± 0.71 minutes in the bolus + infusion group
(P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the hemoglobin (Hb) level, platelet count, white
blood cell (WBC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine level (P > 0.050).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested that bolus-only dose of eptifibatide before PCI
could be able to decrease significantly bleeding complication and other clinical and
cardiovascular outcomes.
Keywords :
Myocardial Infarction , Infusion , Eptifibatide , Dosage , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Bleeding