Title of article
Reply to: Improving the Quality of the Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Author/Authors
Zamani, Mohammad Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol , Alizadeh-Navaei, Reza Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari , Zahed Pasha, Yadollah Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol
Pages
1
From page
184
To page
184
Abstract
We appreciate the interest and comments by Behzadifar et al on our meta-analysis.1 They proposed some methodological suggestions to improve quality of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses, mainly by controlling the bias. We of course agree that these measures are helpful to report more accurate results, but they are not necessary for performing such studies. Also there are several meta-analyses which did not consider these elements.2 In addition, Behzadifar et al’s comments seem to be general, and are not specific to our study. For example, CONSORT is related to the randomized controlled trials, not epidemiologic studies. Also, Egger’s and Begg’s tests are not used for meta-analyses conducting on descriptive studies.3,4 However, we will try to consider all these suggestions for future systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Keywords
Meta-analyses , Improving , Reply , CONSORT
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year
2018
Record number
2446100
Link To Document