Author/Authors :
Ebneshahidi, Amin Anesthesiologist, Sadi Hospital, Isfahan , Akbari, Mojtaba Epidemiologist, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Mohseni, Masood Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology - School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Heshmati, Bahram Public Health, Persia Research Center, Isfahan , Aghadavoudi, Omid Associate Professor - Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care - School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Abstract :
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)
morphine versus intravenous PCA with methadone for postoperative pain management. METHODS: In a randomized controlled
clinical trial, 400 patients were randomly allocated to receive either morphine or methadone delivered via intravenous PCA after
surgery. Patients were followed for 24 hours after surgery. Pain and patient satisfaction was assessed via numeric rating scale as well
as sedation score. Data on the incidence of nausea and vomiting, severe sedation and pruritus were also collected. RESULTS: Pain
scores at 1 and 3 hours postoperatively in the morphine group was significantly higher than methadone group (p < 0.050), but the
trend of pain score, sedation score and the incidence of nausea and vomiting during the 24 hours follow-up were not significantly
different between groups. Patients in the methadone group had higher ratings of satisfaction than the morphine group (p = 0.001). Incidence
of pruritus in morphine group were higher than the methadone group (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: PCA with methadone
might be more effective than PCA with morphine in reducing postoperative pain during the first hours after surgery with less frequency
of pruritus.
Keywords :
Patient-controlled Analgesia , Morphine , Methadone , Pain Management