Title of article
A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio‑Oss/ Bio‑Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial
Author/Authors
Amoian, Babak Departments of Periodontology - Oral Health Center, Dental Faculty - Babol University of Medical Sciences , Moudi, Ehsan Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology - Dental Faculty - Babol University of Medical Sciences , Seyed Majidi, Maryam Dental Faculty - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol , Tabatabaei, S. M. Ali Departments of Periodontology - Oral Health Center, Dental Faculty - Babol University of Medical Sciences
Pages
8
From page
446
To page
453
Abstract
Background: Several grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge augmentation. The
literature lacks researches to compare CenoBone to other grafting materials. The aim of this study
was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio‑Oss/Bio‑Gide complex in lateral
alveolar bone augmentation in terms of radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters.
Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, ten patients who needed lateral
ridge augmentation were selected and augmentations were done using either of CenoBone/
CenoMembrane or Bio‑Oss/Bio‑Gide complexes. In the re‑entry surgery in 6 months following
augmentation, core biopsies were taken and clinical, radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric
evaluations were performed.
Results: No statistically significant difference was seen between groups except for the number of
blood vessels and percentage of residual graft materials.
Conclusion: CenoBone seems to present a comparable lateral ridge augmentation to Bio‑Oss in.
Keywords
Alveolar bone grafting , alveolar ridge augmentations , Bio-Oss
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year
2016
Record number
2470110
Link To Document