Title of article :
Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
Author/Authors :
Sampath Madhyastha, Prashanthi Departments of Dental Materials - Manipal University - Mangalore - Karnataka, India , Hegde, Shreya Departments of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics - Manipal University - Mangalore - Karnataka, India , Srikant, N Departments of Oral Pathology - Manipal College of Dental Sciences - Mangalore - Mangalore - Karnataka, India University , Kotian, Ravindra Departments of Dental Materials - Manipal University - Mangalore - Karnataka, India , Sriraman Iyer, Srividhya Departments of Dental Materials, Manipal College of Dental Sciences - Mangalore - Manipal University - Mangalore - Karnataka, India
Abstract :
Background: Surface roughness associated with improper finishing/polishing of restorations can
result in plaque accumulation, gingival irritation, surface staining, and poor esthetic of restored teeth.
The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of various finishing and polishing systems and time using
various procedures on surface roughness of some esthetic restorative materials.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, samples of two composite materials, compomer
and glass ionomer cement (GIC) materials, were fabricated. Finishing and polishing were done
immediately (n = 40) and after 1 week (n = 40) using four systems (diamond bur + soflex discs;
diamond bur + Astropol polishing brush; tungsten carbide bur + soflex discs; tungsten carbide
bur + Astropol polishing brush). Surface roughness was measured using surface profilometer. Data
were statistically analyzed by t‑test (for each material and time period) and one‑way analysis of
variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc (for finishing and polishing systems) at a significant level of
P < 0.05.
Results: Analysis of time period, irrespective of finishing and polishing system showed that Ra values
were greater (P < 0.05) in delayed polishing in GIC > Z100 > Filtek P90 > Dyract AP, suggesting
immediate polishing is better. Among the materials, Filtek P90 had the least Ra values indicating
the smoothest surface among all materials, followed by Z100, Dyract AP, and GIC. Comparison of
polishing and finishing systems irrespective of materials showed that Ra values were lower (P > 0.05)
in diamond + Astropol combination whereas diamond + soflex had the greatest Ra values.
Conclusion: It might be concluded that: (i) Filtek P90 showed least Ra values followed
by < Z100 < Dyract < GIC; (ii) immediate (24 h) finishing/polishing of materials is better than
delayed; and (iii) among all these polishing systems, diamond bur–Astropol and Astrobrush showed
good surface finish.
Keywords :
Artglass dental composits , dental esthetic , material , dental finishing , dental polishing
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics