Title of article :
Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial
Author/Authors :
Kansal, Ankur Departments of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics - Paonta Sahib - Sirmour - Himachal Pradesh, India , Kittur, Nandan Departments of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics - and 3Periodontics - KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences - KLE University - Belgaum - Karnataka, India , Kumbhojkar, Vinayak Departments of Periodontics - KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences - KLE University - Belgaum - Karnataka, India , Mahabaleshwar Keluskar, Kanhoba Departments of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics - and 3Periodontics - KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences - KLE University - Belgaum - Karnataka, India , Dahiya, Parveen Departments of Periodontics - Himachal Institute of Dental Sciences - Paonta Sahib - Sirmour - Himachal Pradesh, India
Pages :
8
From page :
481
To page :
488
Abstract :
Background: Low-intensity laser therapy (LILT) can be utilized for different treatments in the fi eld of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effi cacy of LILT on (1) the rate of canine movement during canine retraction phase and (2) evaluate the radiographic changes occurring during LILT around the irradiated area. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 patients of both genders were included for this study. One quadrant of the upper arch was considered control group (CG) and received mechanical activation of the canine teeth with 150 g. The opposite quadrant received the same mechanical activation and was also irradiated with a diode emitting light (gallium-arsenide laser) at 904 nm, for 10 s at 12 mW, at 4.2 J/cm2. Laser application was done on 1st day, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21th, 28th, 35th, 42nd, 49th, 56th day respectively during the canine retraction phase. Distance was measured on 1st day, 35th day and 63rd day and appliance activation was done on 1st and 35th day. Results were analyzed using t-test with the signifi cance level set at P < 0.01. Results: Mean value obtained from 1st to 63rd day was 3.30 ± 2.36 mm for CG and 3.53 ± 2.30 mm for laser group (LG). Conclusion: There was no statistically signifi cant difference in the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction between the LG and the CG. There was no evidence of any pathologic changes in the radiograph following LILT.
Keywords :
Bone remodeling , canine retraction , gallium-arsenide diode laser , orthodontic tooth movement
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year :
2014
Record number :
2473549
Link To Document :
بازگشت