Title of article :
X‑tip intraosseous injection system as a primary anesthesia for irreversible pulpitis of posterior mandibular teeth: A randomized clinical trail
Author/Authors :
Razavian, Hamid Department of Endodontics - School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Kazemi, Shantia School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Khazaei, Saber School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Zare Jahromi, Maryam Department of Endodontics - Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences - Khorasgan, Isfahan
Abstract :
Background: Successful anesthesia during root canal therapy may be difficult to obtain. Intraosseous
injection significantly improves anesthesia’s success as a supplemental pulpal anesthesia, particularly in
cases of irreversible pulpitis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of X‑tip intraosseous
injection and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block in primary anesthesia for mandibular posterior
teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Materials and Methods: Forty emergency patients with an irreversible pulpitis of mandibular
posterior teeth were randomly assigned to receive either intraosseous injection using the X‑tip
intraosseous injection system or IAN block as the primary injection method for pulpal anesthesia.
Pulpal anesthesia was evaluated using an electric pulp tester and endo ice at 5‑min intervals for
15 min. Anesthesia’s success or failure rates were recorded and analyzed using SPSS version 12
statistical software. Success or failure rates were compared using a Fisher’s exact test, and the
time duration for the onset of anesthesia was compared using Mann–Whitney U test. P < 0.05
was considered significant.
Results: Intraosseous injection system resulted in successful anesthesia in 17 out of 20 patients
(85%). Successful anesthesia was achieved with the IAN block in 14 out of 20 patients (70%).
However, the difference (15%) was not statistically significant (P = 0.2).
Conclusion: Considering the relatively expensive armamentarium, probability of penetrator
separation, temporary tachycardia, and possibility of damage to root during drilling, the authors
do not suggest intraosseous injection as a suitable primary technique.
Keywords :
Anesthesia , intraosseous injection , irreversible pulpitis
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics