Author/Authors :
Dodani, Ali Student Research Committee - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Siadati, Sepideh Department of Pathology - Faculty of Medicine - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Salehinejad, Jahanshah Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology - Faculty of Dentistry - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology - Faculty of Medicine - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Abbaszadeh - Bidokhty, Hamid Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology - Faculty of Dentistry - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Differentiation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts is an initial and very important
event in tumor genesis. Myofibroblasts produce proteinases that stimulate invasion in cancers. Due
to the more malignant potential of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous
squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) , the aim of the present study was to compare myofibroblasts
between OSCC and CSCC to understand whether myofibroblasts can help more malignant
potential of OSCC compared to CSCC or not.
Materials &Methods: This cross-sectional study included 40 cases of OSCC and CSCC and 20
cases of normal skin and normal oral mucosa. Then, 4-micron sections of paraffin-embedded
tissue blocks of studied groups were stained immunohistochemically with α-SMA antibody. Mean
percentage of myofibroblasts was calculated in invasive fronts of OSCCs with CSCCs and also in
normal samples and staining intensity of cells for α-SMA marker and distribution pattern of
myofibroblasts were determined.
Results: The differences of average percentage of myofibroblasts in OSCC and CSCC compared
to normal groups were significant (Pvalue= 0.007 and Pvalue=0.003 respectively), but when we
compared OSCCs and CSCCs, the difference was not significant. Also, there were no significant
differences between OSCC and CSCC with regard to staining intensity and pattern.
Conclusion: Different biologic behavior of OSCC compared to CSCC doesn’t depend on
myofibroblasts and other factors can be involved.
Keywords :
Carcinoma , Evaluation , Squamous cells , Myofibroblasts