Author/Authors :
Mohammadi Majd, Tahereh Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology - Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences - School of Public Health, Kermanshah, Iran , Kalantari, Shiva Chronic Kidney Disease Research Center - Labbafinejad Hospital - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Raeisi Shahraki, Hadi Department of Biostatistics - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , Nafar, Mohsen Urology-Nephrology Research Center - Labbafinejad Hospital - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Almasi, Afshin Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology - School of Public Health - Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran , Samavat, Shiva Department of Nephrology - Labbafinejad Medical Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Parvin, Mahmoud Department of Pathology - Labbafinejad Medical Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Hashemian, Amirhossein Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH) - Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract :
Background: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis diagnosed based on renal
biopsy. Mesangial IgA deposits along with the proliferation of mesangial cells are the histologic hallmark of IgAN.
Non-invasive diagnostic tools may help to prompt diagnosis and therapy. The discovery of potential and reliable
urinary biomarkers for diagnosis of IgAN depends on applying robust and suitable models. Applying two
multivariate modeling methods on a urine proteomic dataset were obtained from IgAN patients, and comparison
of the results of these methods were the purpose of this study. Methods: Two models were constructed for
urinary protein profiles of 13 patients and 8 healthy individuals, based on sparse linear discriminant analysis
(SLDA) and elastic net (EN) regression methods. A panel of selected biomarkers with the best coefficients were
proposed and further analyzed for biological relevance using functional annotation and pathway analysis. Results:
Transferrin, α1-antitrypsin, and albumin fragments were the most important up-regulated biomarkers, while
fibulin-5, YIP1 family member 3, prasoposin, and osteopontin were the most important down-regulated
biomarkers. Pathway analysis revealed that complement and coagulation cascades and extracellular matrixreceptor
interaction pathways impaired in the pathogenesis of IgAN. Conclusion: SLDA and EN had an equal
importance for diagnosis of IgAN and were useful methods for exploring and processing proteomic data. In
addition, the suggested biomarkers are reliable candidates for further validation to non-invasive diagnose of IgAN
based on urine examination.
Keywords :
Proteomics , IgA nephropathy , Diagnosis , Biomarker