Author/Authors :
Okorie, Ogechukwu Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology - Faculty of Pharmacy - University of Lagos - College of Medicine Campus, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria , Azubuike, Chukwuemeka Paul Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology - Faculty of Pharmacy - University of Lagos - College of Medicine Campus, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria , Ilomuanya, Margaret Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology - Faculty of Pharmacy - University of Lagos - College of Medicine Campus, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria , Ukoma, Uloma Ubani Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology - Faculty of Pharmacy - University of Lagos - College of Medicine Campus, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria
Abstract :
The study is aimed at assessing the bioequivalence/quality of different brands
of atorvastatin calcium 10mg tablets marketed in Nigeria.
Physical parameters of the tablets, drug content, dissolution and
pharmacokinetics data were assessed. The in vivo bioavailability study was
carried out using a single dose randomized two period cross-over designs
measuring the concentrations in plasma. Plasma samples before dosing and at
various time intervals up to 48 hours after dosing were analysed using High-
Performance Liquid Chromatography together with UV detector.
Pharmacokinetics parameters (Cmax and AUC) were determined and subjected
to statistical analysis.
All brands complied with the official specification for uniformity of weight and
disintegration time. Assay of atorvastatin tablets revealed that all samples
contained atorvastatin calcium as their active ingredient between 91.4-
102.1% (w/w) of labelled potency. The dissolution profiles showed inter
brand variability. Four brands attained 70% dissolution within 45 minutes,
however, at 60 minutes, all the brands released over 80% of the drug. In vivo
bioavailability study showed that three out of the four brands were
bioequivalent to the innovator brand and can be substituted for each other in
their prescription.
Chemical equivalence does not indicate bioequivalence and one brand
substituted on assumption of chemical equivalence with another brand may
not give the desired onset of action and therapeutic effectiveness. Moreover,
dissolution test might not be enough for ascertaining bioequivalence of
atorvastatin and in vivo tests may be required to ensure the quality of
marketed brands of atorvastatin.
Keywords :
Atorvastatin , Bioequivalence , Generics , Innovator Brands , Post Market Survey