Author/Authors :
Mahdavi Rad, Masoomeh Department of Anesthesiology - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran , Rashidi, Mahbobeh Department of Anesthesiology - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran , Nassajian, Nozar Department of Anesthesia - Pain Research Center - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran , Salari, Amir Department of Anesthesia - Pain Research Center - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran , Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza Department of Anesthesiology - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran , Hesam, Saeed Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology - School of Public Health - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran , Hedayati, Ehsan Student Research Committee - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Comparison of midazolam and propofol has been done hoping to reduce the incidence rates of emergence agitation
(EA) after anesthesia. Both drugs however, are still under inspection as for their effect on EA after using Isoflurane for maintenance
of anesthesia.
Objectives: This study was designed for measuring the effect of either propofol or midazolam near the end of tonsillectomy operation
on incidence of EA during the recovery phase.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind study, 90 children, aged 5 to 15, undergoing anesthesia with Isoflurane were randomly
assigned to three groups receiving either propofol (group P), midazolam (group M) or saline (group S) near the end of anesthesia.
Severity and incidence of EA were then calculated using the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scale.
Results: The mean PAED score in group P was (2.872.69) and (1.902.55) in group M. Both were significantly lower than group S
(7.603.78) (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference in the duration of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay between
groups P (42.5012.58) andM(48.3324.26), groups P and S (52.0010.64) and between groupsMand S (P > 0.05). No significant
difference was found between all groups for apnea and laryngospasm (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Administration of either midazolam or propofol near the end of operation may result in reduction of EA in children
undergoing tonsillectomy after Isoflurane anesthesia.
Keywords :
PAED , Anesthesia , Emergence Agitation , Isoflurane , Propofol , Midazolam