Title of article
Differentiation Between Transudative and Exudative Pleural Effusions by DiffusionWeighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Author/Authors
Keskin, Zeynep Department of Radiology - Konya Training and Research Hospital - Konya, Turkey , ¸sildag, Mihrican Ye Department of Chest Diseases - Konya Training and Research Hospital - Konya, Turkey , Alkan, Ender Department of Radiology - Konya Training and Research Hospital - Konya, Turkey , Kayhan, Ay¸segül Department of Radiology - Konya Training and Research Hospital - Konya, Turkey , Tolu, I˙smet Department of Radiology - Konya Training and Research Hospital - Konya, Turkey , Sat Keskin, Suat Department of Radiology - Park Hayat Hospital - Konya, Turkey
Pages
7
From page
1
To page
7
Abstract
Background: Pleural effusion could develop in very different pathological conditions. It is important to characterize pleural effusion
and to identify its etiology. Different radiological methods, such as ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used for the diagnosis of pleural effusion.
Objectives: To assess the ability of diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps to differentiate transudative
effusions (TEs) from exudative effusions (EEs).
Patients and Methods: This prospective observational, single center study was performed on 100 consecutive patients who had
pleural fluid detected by chest X-ray, US, or CT and were referred for MRI. Afterwards diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) was obtained
using a multislice, single shot, respiratory triggered spin echo, echo planar imaging sequence. Pleural effusions obtained with
thoracentesis were classified into TEs or EEs according to the clinical criteria established by clinical, pathologic findings and Light’s
criteria. Analysis of MRI was interpreted by one radiologist specialist who was blinded to clinical findings and according to the
clinical criteria established by Light.
Results: The ADCs of EEs were significantly lower than those of the TEs. The difference between the mean ADC values of TEs and EEs
was significant (P < 0.01). The optimum cutoff point for ADC values was 3.5110-3mm2/s, with a sensitivity of 90.4% and a specificity
of 78%.
Conclusion: We conclude that ADC value is a noninvasive, reliable, and reproducible imaging parameter that may help to assess
and characterize pleural effusion.
Keywords
Pleural Effusion , DiffusionWeighted Imaging , Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
Journal title
Iranian Journal of Radiology (IJR)
Serial Year
2019
Record number
2499312
Link To Document