Author/Authors :
Ufuk, Furkan Department of Radiology - Pamukkale University Hospital - University of Pamukkale - Denizli, Turkey , Kaya, Furkan Department of Radiology - University of Kocatepe - Afyonkarahisar, Turkey , Herek, Duygu Department of Radiology - Pamukkale University Hospital - University of Pamukkale - Denizli, Turkey , Sagtas, Ergin Department of Radiology - Pamukkale University Hospital - University of Pamukkale - Denizli, Turkey , Cakmak, Pinar Department of Radiology - Pamukkale University Hospital - University of Pamukkale - Denizli, Turkey , Baki Yagci, Ahmet Department of Radiology - Pamukkale University Hospital - University of Pamukkale - Denizli, Turkey
Abstract :
Background: Increased right ventricle-to-left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has
been reported as a poor prognostic indicator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). It has also been reported that pulmonary
vein sign (PVS) on CTPA is a rare finding of PE.
Objectives: To evaluate PVS on CTPA and unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with PE suspicion. We also
aimed to investigate the relationship between the severity of PE and presence of PVS, RV/LV ratio and combination of these two on
unenhanced MRI.
Patients and Methods: One-hundred-twelve patients with PE suspicion who underwent CTPA and unenhanced-MRI [steady state
free precession (SSFP)] within the first 48-hours constituted the study group. All CTPA images were evaluated for the presence, location
and severity of PE by observer-1. Two observers (observer-2 and 3), independently evaluated unenhanced-MR images for the
presence of PVS without knowing the results of CTPA. Then, these 2 observers reviewed the CTPA and MRI images together with
observer-4 to reach the final consensus for the presence of PVS and measurement of RV/LV ratio. Cohen’s Kappa analysis was used
to assess the agreement between observers. Relationship between the mean PE index and imaging findings (PVS, RV/LV) were calculated.
Results: Presence of PVS on CT or MRI is significantly correlated with PE index and patients with PVS had more severe PE than those
without. Presence of both PVS and RV/LV ratio > 1 on MRI indicates more severe pulmonary embolism than absence of PVS or RV/LV
ratio > 1. There was a very good agreement for the detection of PVS between two observers on unenhanced MRI.
Conclusion: PVS on CTPA or unenhanced MRI can be used as a sign of severe PE and it may also be an indicator of right heart dysfunction.
Keywords :
Pulmonary Thromboembolism , CT Angiography , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pulmonary Vein , Severity of Illness Index