Title of article :
Differential Effects of Unihemispheric Concurrent Dual-Site and Conventional tDCS on Motor Learning: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study
Author/Authors :
Talimkhani, Ailin Department of Physical Therapy - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Abdollahi, Iraj Department of Physical Therapy - University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences , Mohseni-Bandpei, Mohammad Ali Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center - University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences , Ehsani, Fatemeh Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center - Semnan University of Medical Science , Khalili, Sanaz Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology - School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, , Jaberzadeh, Shapour Non-invasive Brain Stimulation & Neuroplasticity Laboratory - Department of Physiotherapy - Monash University - Melbourne - Australia
Abstract :
Introduction: Based on the literature, unihemispheric concurrent dual-site anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCSUHCDS) of primary Motor cortex (M1) and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) would be more efficient than conventional a-tDCS of M1 to induce larger and longer-lasting M1 corticospinal excitability. The main objective of the present study was to compare the effects of a-tDCSUHCDS and conventional M1 a-tDCS on the extent and durability of the motor sequence acquisition in healthy individuals.
Methods: In this randomized sham-controlled study, healthy volunteers were randomly divided into three groups: experimental (a-tDCSUHCDS), control (M1 a-tDCS), and sham stimulation groups. The participants practiced serial response time task over three consecutive days when they simultaneously received a-tDCS. Using the skill measure, we assessed motor learning up to 4 weeks after the completion of experimental conditions.
Results: Data analysis revealed that all groups exhibited the improved trend over the training course (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in skill acquisition among groups at post-intervention (P>0.05), while a significant improvement was observed between experimental and sham group at the retention time (P<0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the control and two other groups with regard to the retention time (P>0.05).
Conclusion: These results revealed a significant increase in the skill acquisition by a-tDCSUHCDS technique with regard to retention issue, which could be a valuable finding in neuro-rehabilitation field.
Keywords :
Transcranial direct current stimulation , Primary motor cortex , Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , Learning , Motor skills
Journal title :
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience