Title of article :
Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers
Author/Authors :
BEIGZADEH, AMIN Department of Medical Education - Medical Education Research Center - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , BAHAADINBEIGY, KAMBIZ Medical Informatics Research Center - Institute for Futures Studies in Health - Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , ADIBI, PEYMAN Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , YAMANI, NIKOO Department of Medical Education - Medical Education Research Center - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: The use of clinical rounds, as an integral part of
clinical teaching to help medical students acquire essential skills
of practicing medicine, is critically important. An understanding
of medical teachers’ perceptions concerning the challenges of
clinical rounds can help identify the key areas of focus to better
foster professional development of medical students. This study
explored the opinions of medical teachers of Kerman University
of Medical Sciences about the challenges embedded in clinical
rounds. There is a paucity of studies regarding the topic under
investigation in our context.
Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using a
conventional content analysis method. We held a focus group
discussion with eight skilled bedside teachers, chosen using
purposive sampling, from Kerman University of Medical Sciences
in February 2018. The focus group lasted for approximately
2 hours. The session was audio-taped. We analyzed data by
considering the verbatim transcribed document of the audiorecorded
discussions using conventional content analysis method
for theme development. Informed consent was obtained from the
participants.
Results: Medical teachers described many primary challenges to
clinical rounds. Some of them were multiple students on rounding
practices, time constraints, priority of research and patient care to
teaching, and lack of participation and enthusiasm. We categorized
these varied challenges into 5 specific areas related to (1) system;
(2) teachers; (3) learners; (4) patients; and (5) evaluation issues.
Focus group participants expressed some suggestions to mitigate
barriers such as having fewer students on the rounds, addressing
time constraints through planning and flexibility, and the provision
of medical education award.
Conclusion: Clinical round practices are valuable but replete
with a spectrum of problems. Many challenges affect the quality
of teaching in clinical rounds that should be taken into account
by bedside teachers in order to improve the quality of rounding
practices. The identified challenges can be used in redressing
bedside teaching to have more efficient rounding practices.
Keywords :
Medical teachers , Focus group , Clinical
Journal title :
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism