Title of article :
Ameliorative Effects of Different Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Paradigms on the Novel Object Recognition Task in a Rat Model of Alzheimer Disease
Author/Authors :
Zarifkar, Amir Hossein Department of Physiology - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Zarifkar, Asadollah Department of Physiology - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Nami, Mohammad Department of Neuroscience - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Rafati, Ali Department of Physiology - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Aligholi, Hadi Department of Neuroscience - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Vafaee, Farzaneh Department of Neuroscience - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Background: Treatment of Alzheimer as a disease that is associated with cognitive impairment
has been associated with some restrictions. Recently, researchers have focused on non-pharmacological treatments, including non-invasive stimulation of the brain by transcranial electrical
stimulation (tES). Four main paradigms of transcranial electrical current include transcranial
direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternative current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), transcranial pulse current stimulation (tPCS). The
tDCS is a possible new therapeutic option for patients with cognitive impairment, including
Alzheimer disease. Materials and Methods: The study was done on Sprague-Dawley male rats
weighing 250-270 g. to develop Alzheimer’s model, the cannula was implanted bilaterally into
the hippocampus. Aβ 25-35 (5μg/ 2.5µl/day) was microinjected bilaterally for 4 days. Then, an
electrical stimulation paradigm was applied to the animal for 6 days. Animal cognitive capacity
was evaluated on day 11 and 12 by novel object recognition (NOR) test. Results: Our results
showed that application of tDCS; tACS; tRNS and tPCS reversed beta-amyloid-induced impairment (P<0.05). The tRNS Group spent total exploration time around the objects compared to
other groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the four different paradigms
in discrimination ratio and the percentage of total exploration time. Conclusion: The results
of this study showed that the use of multiple sessions of different tES paradigms could improve
Aβ-induced memory impairment in the NOR test. Therefore, based on evidence, it can be expected that in addition to using tDCS, other stimulatory paradigms may also be considered in
the treatment of AD. [GMJ.2019;8:e1440] DOI:10.31661/gmj.v8i0.1440
Keywords :
Alzheimer Disease , Memory , Cognitive Impairment , Novel Object Recognition
Journal title :
Galen Medical Journal (GMJ)