Author/Authors :
Srivastava, S Department of Radiotherapy - King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India , Painuly, N. K Department of Radiotherapy King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India , Mishra, S. P Department of Radiation Oncology Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India , Srivastava, K Department of Radiotherapy King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India , Singh, N Department of Radiotherapy King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India , Singh, S Department of Radiotherapy King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India , Bhatt, M. L. B Radiation Oncology King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract :
Background: Brachytherapy treatment planning in cervix carcinoma patients using
two dimensional (2D) orthogonal images provides only point dose estimates while
CT-based planning provides volumetric dose assessment helping in understanding the
correlation between morbidity and the dose to organs at risk (OARs) and treatment
volume.
Objective: Aim of present study is to compare International Commission on Radiation
Units and Measurements Report 38 (ICRU 38) reference point doses to OARs
with volumetric doses using 2D images and CT images in patients with cervical cancer.
Material and Methods: In this prospective study, 20 patients with cervical
cancer stages (IIB-IIIB) were planned for a brachytherapy dose of 7Gy per fraction
for three fractions using 2D image-based treatment plan and CT-based plan. ICRU 38
points for bladder and rectum were identified on both 2D image-based plan and CTbased
plan and doses (DICRU) at these points were compared to the minimum dose to
2cc volume (D2cc) of bladder and rectum receiving the highest dose.
Results: D2cc bladder dose was 1.60 (±0.67) times more than DICRUb bladder dose
whereas D2cc rectum dose was 1.13±0.40 times DICRUr. Significant difference was found
between DICRUb and D2cc dose for bladder (p=.0.016) while no significant difference was
seen between DICRUr and D2cc dose for rectum (p=0.964).
Conclusion: The study suggests that ICRU 38 point doses are not the true representation
of maximum doses to OARs. CT-based treatment planning is more a reliable
tool for OAR dose assessment than the conventional 2D radiograph-based plan.