Author/Authors :
Soylu, Ahmet Department of Urology - Gozde Akademi Hospital - Malatya, Turkey , Sarier, Mehmet Department of Urology - Medical Park Hospital - Antalya Turkey , Altunoluk, Bulent Department of Urology - Medical Park Hospital - Antalya Turkey , Soylemez, Haluk Department of Urology - Aile Hospital - Istanbul, Turkey , Baydinc, Yasar Can Occupational Physician - Izmir, Turkey
Abstract :
Purpose: We aimed to find out if there was any difference between intramuscular and intravenous administration
of lornoxicam in terms of efficacy and side effects.
Materials and Methods: This study was a single-blind parallel-group randomized clinical trial. A total of 51
patients who were diagnosed with acute renal colic at our clinic were included in the study. Pain severity prior to
treatment was rated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients were randomized into 2 groups: Group 1 (n
= 27) received intramuscular 8mg lornoxicam and Group 2 (n=24) received intravenous 8mg lornoxicam. Pain
severity was reassessed 30 minutes after the treatment. Pre- and post-treatment VAS scores and the mean change
in the VAS scores of the 2 groups were statistically compared.
Results: The mean VAS scores decreased significantly from 7.65 to 2.07 in Group 1, from 7.96 to 1.38 in Group
2, and from 7.79 to 1.75 in total (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between Groups
1 and 2 in terms of VAS score reduction (P = 0.128). None of the patients suffered any side effects except for 1
(2%) patient who had dyspepsia.
Conclusion: Parenteral lornoxicam provides significant pain relief in patients with acute renal colic. However, no
significant difference was found between intramuscular and intravenous
administration in terms of analgesic efficacy.
Keywords :
lornoxicam , parenteral treatment , acute renal colic , urolithiasis