Title of article :
Is screening of Staghorn Stones cost-effective?
Author/Authors :
Kavosh, Ali Muhammad Department of Community Medicine - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Aminsharifi, Ali Reza Department of Urology - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Keshtkar, Vahid Department of Community Medicine - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Jafari, Abdosaleh Health management and economics research center - Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran , Abdollahifard, Gholamreza Department of Community Medicine - School of Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences - Drug abuse and mental health research center - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Background: Staghorn stones can cause damage to the kidneys and are considered as the one of the main cause of
renal failure. If they are identified during the initial stages of diagnosis, kidney damage can be prevented. Screening
can lead to a better diagnosis. Before the screening, it is necessary to calculate the cost-effectiveness of screening.
Methods: Using the possibility calculations of staghorn stones in the society and different age groups as well as a
decision tree model, the screening costs and effectiveness were calculated against no screening. Effectiveness was
determined based on the number of prevented cases of renal failure. Ultimately, the incremental cost-effectiveness
ration (ICER) was calculated and compared with the World Health Organization (WHO) method based on the
gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and subgroup analysis was done for different age groups. In addition, the
robustness of results was examined by sensitivity analysis.
Results: The results of decision tree showed that in the screening group, the expected cost was 8815997 USD and
the expected effectiveness was 358 and in the no-screening group, the expected cost was 3954214 USD and the
expected effectiveness was 258. Based on the results of the study, screening compared with no screening would
increase the cost by 4861783 USD and effectiveness would increase by 100 people. The incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) showed that for each unit of increase in effectiveness of screening compared
with no screening, would lead to an increase the cost by 48618 USD. The results also indicated that screening
30-70-year-old people compared with other age groups (20-70 and 25-70) if done every two years, could reduce
the mean costs per preventing each case of renal failure.
Conclusion: If screening staghorn stones are done every two years for 30-70-year-old individuals, it would be
cost effective considering WHO method and 3026 USD could be saved in the health care system per each person.
Keywords :
Staghorn stones , screening , cost effectiveness , kidney stone
Journal title :
Urology Journal