Title of article :
Comparison of survival rate and complications of percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, and medical treatment in patients with left main and/or three vessel diseases
Author/Authors :
Khosravi, Alireza Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Interventional Cardiology Research Center , Vakhshoori, Mehrbod Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Heart Failure Research Center , Sharif, Vahid Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Hypertension Research Center , Roghani-Dehkordi, Farshad Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center , Najafian, Jamshid Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center , Mansouri, Asieh Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Cardiovascular Research Institute - Hypertension Research Center
Abstract :
BACKGROUND: The probable complications of 3 different cardiovascular diseases treatment
options including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft
(CABG), and medical therapy (MT), especially in individuals suffering from left main (LM)
and/or three vessel diseases (3VDs), have received less attention. Thus, the aim of this study
was to compare the complications of the aforementioned therapeutic strategies in patients
admitted with LM coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or having 3VDs.
METHODS: From March 2018 to March 2019, a total number of 251 eligible individuals (87, 86,
and 78 subjects treated with PCI, CABG, and MT, respectively) were recruited in this cohort
study. After the initiation of treatment, all individuals were followed for 6 months. Occurrence
of any complications including chest pain (CP), re-hospitalization due to cardiac problems, heart
failure (HF), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke as well as major adverse cardiac
events (MACE) were assessed.
RESULTS: Significantly lower percentages of CP, readmission, and HF were observed in the
CABG group compared to the PCI and MT groups (24.4% vs. 47.1% and 53.9%, P < 0.001; 3.5%
vs. 13.8% and 5.1%, P = 0.020; 1.2% vs. 2.3% and 9%; P = 0.040, respectively). Further analysis
revealed an increased likelihood of hospitalization in the PCI group (OR: 3.82, 95% CI: 1.01-
14.41, P = 0.040), and a lower risk of CP and HF occurrence in the CABG group subjects
compared to the MT group (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.62, P = 0.002 and OR: 0.05, 95% CI:
0.004-0.71, P = 0.030, respectively). This pattern was also observed in the PCI group in terms of
HF (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.83, P = 0.030).
CONCLUSION: Patients suffering from LM and/or 3VDs would most likely benefit from CABG
followed by PCI, rather than MT. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm these results.
Keywords :
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Coronary Vessels , Coronary Artery Disease