Title of article :
New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis
Author/Authors :
Tabatabaei-Malazy, Ozra Diabetes Research Center - Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute -Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center - Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Fifth floor - Dr.Shariati Hospital - North Kargar Ave, Tehran , Salari, Pooneh Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Khashayar, Patricia Osteoporosis Research Center - Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Center for Microsystems Technology - Imec and Ghent University - Gent-Zwijnaarde - Belgium , Larijani, Bagher Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center - Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Fifth floor - Dr.Shariati Hospital - North Kargar Ave, Tehran
Abstract :
Background: Prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing both in developed and developing countries. Due to rapid growth in the burden and cost of osteoporosis, worldwide, it seems reasonable to focus on the reduction of
fractures as the main goal of treatment. Although, efficient pharmacological agents are available for the treatment
of osteoporosis, there still remains a need to more specific drugs with less adverse effects.
Main body: This review article provides a brief update on the pathogenesis, presenting current pharmacological
products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Europe, and also newer therapeutic agents
to treat osteoporosis according to the clinical trial data available at PubMed, UpToDate, International Osteoporosis
Foundation (IOF), and clinical practice guidelines. As well, the effect of combination therapy and recommendations
for future research will be further discussed.
Short conclusion: The use of current antiresorptive and anabolic agents alone or in combinations for the
treatment of osteoporosis entails several limitations. Mainly, their efficacy on non-vertebral fracture reduction is
lower than that observed on vertebral fracture. In addition, they have potential adverse events on long time usage.
Development of newer agents such as cathepsin k inhibitor and strontium ranelate not only have increased the
available options for treating osteoporosis, but also have opened doors of opportunity to improvements in the
effective treatment. However, the high cost of new agents have restricted their usage in selective patients who are
at high risk of fracture or whom failed response to first line treatment options. Thus, personalized medicine should
be considered for future evaluation of genetic risk score and also for environmental exposure assessment. In
addition to permanent attention to early diagnosis of osteoporosis and understanding of the pathophysiology of
osteoporosis for novel approach in drug discovery, there seems a need to more well-designed clinical trials with
larger sample sizes and longer duration on current as well as on newer agents. Also, continuous research on
plant-derived components as the source of discovering new agents, and conducting more clinical trials with combination of two or more synthetic drugs, plants, or drug-plant for the treatment of osteoporosis are recommended.
Keywords :
Osteoporosis , Treatment , Fractures , Antiresorptive , Anabolic agents , Personalized medicine , Plants
Journal title :
Daru:Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences