Title of article
Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction
Author/Authors
Chung, Helen Vector Eye Centre, Calgary, Canada , Sanders, Emi Section of Ophthalmology - Department of Surgery - University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada , Rocha, Guillermo Department of Ophthalmology - University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada , Bhamra, Jamie Vector Eye Centre, Calgary, Canada
Pages
4
From page
99
To page
102
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the opinions of Canadian ophthalmologists on refractive and presbyopia‑correcting surgeries.
Methods: We distributed an online survey to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society members, covering laser refractive surgery (LRS),
femtosecond laser‑assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), lenticular refractive surgery (lenRS) that includes cataract refractive surgery (CRS)
with premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and presbyopia correction.
Results: There were 68 (7.6%) total respondents. Most respondents would not consider LRS (62.5%) nor FLACS (73.9%) for themselves. Male
sex and performance of LRS or FLACS was significantly associated with consideration of these procedures for self. Most respondents (59.3%)
would consider lenRS for themselves. The top method of personal presbyopia correction was spectacles, chosen by 52.5%.
Conclusions: When surveying the wide body of Canadian ophthalmologists, most respondents preferred spectacle correction of presbyopia and
would consider lenRS, but not LRS or FLACS for themselves. Surgeons performing these procedures were more likely to consider them for self.
Keywords
Femtosecond laser‑assisted cataract surgery , Intraocular lens , Presbyopia , Refractive surgery
Journal title
Journal of Current Ophthalmology
Serial Year
2020
Record number
2520742
Link To Document