Title of article :
Efficacy of Er,Cr Laser incision Corticotomy in Rapid Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
Author/Authors :
Mahmoudzadeh, Majid Department of Orthodontics - Faculty of Dentistry - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Poormoradi, Banafshe Assistant Professor - Laser Research Center - Department of Periodontology - School of Dentistry - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Alijani, Sara Orthodontic Department - Dental Faculty - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Farhadian, Maryam Assistant Professor of Biostatistics - Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center - Department of Biostatistics - School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Kazemisaleh, Azadeh Postgraduate Student - Department of Orthodontics - School of Dentistry - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Introduction: This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of lasercision corticotomy for the acceleration of canine movement. Our secondary objectives were assessing the canine rotation, the rate of anchorage control, the level of pain, and the gingival index (GI).
Methods: Twelve orthodontic patients (9 females and 3 males) referring to the School of Dentistry
and one dental clinic from May 2019 to September 2019 participated in this split-mouth randomized
clinical trial. The allocation of the test and control sides was performed by flipping a coin. The mean
age of patients was 18.91±3.87 years (range 15-30 years). The treatment plan included maxillary first
premolar extraction. Following the initial leveling and alignment phase, an initial impression was made.
Corticotomy was carried out with the erbium, chromium-doped yttrium scandium gallium garnet (Er,
Cr: YSGG) laser (3.5 W, 30 Hz, 40% air, 80% water) in one maxillary quadrant (the laser side). Canine
retraction was immediately initiated following surgery using nickel-titanium closed-coil springs with 150
g force. The impression was repeated 1 month after the onset of retraction. The casts were scanned, and
the distance between the canine cusp tip and the rugae line was measured to quantify the amount of
anteroposterior canine movement. The molar anchorage control was also evaluated by measuring the
distance between the mesial contact of the permanent first molar and the rugae line. Gingival health was
evaluated using the GI. The modified McGill pain questionnaire was used to assess the level of patients’
pain.
Results: Lasercision corticotomy accelerated canine retraction with no adverse effect on gingival health.
Anchorage loss in the posterior teeth and pain scores were not significantly different between the control
and laser sides.
Conclusion: Laser corticotomy can effectively accelerate canine retraction with no complications or discomfort for the patients.
Keywords :
Lasers , Orthodontic tooth movement , Acceleration , Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Journal title :
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences