Title of article :
Computationally Efficient System Matrix Calculation Techniques in Computed Tomography Iterative Reconstruction
Author/Authors :
Mahmoudi, Golshan Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Reza Ay, Mohammad Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Rahmim, Arman Department of Radiology and Physics - University of British Columbia , Ghadiri, Hossein Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Relative to classical methods in computed tomography, iterative reconstruction
techniques enable significantly improved image qualities and/or lowered patient doses. However,
the computational speed is a major concern for these iterative techniques. In the present study,
we present a method for fast system matrix calculation based on the line integral model (LIM)
to speed up the computations without compromising the image quality. In addition, we develop
a hybrid line–area integral model (AIM) that highlights the advantages of both LIM and AIMs.
Methods: The contributing detectors for a given pixel and a given projection view, and the length
of corresponding intersection lines with pixels, are calculated using our proposed algorithm.
For the hybrid method, the respective narrow‑angle fan beam was modeled by multiple equally
spaced lines. The computed system matrix was evaluated in the context of reconstruction using the
simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) as well as maximum likelihood expectation
maximization (MLEM). Results: The proposed LIM offers a considerable reduction in calculation
times compared to the standard Siddon algorithm: 2.9 times faster. Differences in root mean square
error and peak signal‑to‑noise ratio were not significant between the proposed LIM and the Siddon
algorithm for both SART and MLEM reconstruction methods (P > 0.05). Meanwhile, the proposed
hybrid method resulted in significantly improved image qualities relative to LIM and the Siddon
algorithm (P < 0.05), though computations were 4.9 times more intensive than the proposed LIM.
Conclusion: We have proposed two fast algorithms to calculate the system matrix. The first is
based on LIM and was faster than the Siddon algorithm, with matched image quality, whereas the
second method is a hybrid LIM–AIM that achieves significantly improved images though with its
computational requirements
Keywords :
Area integral model , computed tomography , forward and back projection , iterative image reconstruction , line integral model , system matrix
Journal title :
Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors (JMSS)