Title of article :
Evaluation of the effect of premedication on pain severity and hemodynamic status of patients undergoing coronary angiography
Author/Authors :
Pelarak, Ferdos Islamic Azad University Dezful Branch, Iran , Azizi, Shilan Department of Nursing - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Islamic Azad University Bandar Abbas Branch, Iran , Mashalchi, Hamideh Department of Nursing - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Tiznobeyk, Behrooz Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Shayestehfard, Marzieh Department of Nursing - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Fakharzadeh, Leila Department of Nursing - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Haghighizadeh, Mohsen School of Public Health - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Sadeghi, Narges Department of Nursing - Islamic Azad University of Isfahan, Khorasan Branch, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
Background: As a stressful invasive procedure, angiography causes pain and several
hemodynamic changes in patients. Various forms of premedication are used to reduce
these complications; however, there is no consensus on their effectiveness. This study
aimed to determine the effect of premedication on pain severity and hemodynamic
status of patients undergoing coronary artery angiography.
Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on candidates for coronary angiography,
who referred to Ganjavian Hospital of Dezful, Iran, in 2012. In total, 102 patients were
selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into three groups of 34
cases. The first group was intravenously administered 4 mg of chlorpheniramine,
whereas the second and third groups were intravenously injected 5 mg of diazepam
and 2 mg of normal saline, respectively, 30 minutes before angiography. Pain intensity
and hemodynamic status of the patients were evaluated and recorded before, during,
and after angiography. Data collection was carried out using visual analogue scale and
hemodynamic status registration form. Data analysis was performed in SPSS, version
19, using Chi-square, One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Friedman, KruskalWallis, and repeated measures ANOVA.
Results: In this study, pain increased in all the three groups after angiography
(P<0.001); however, this difference between the groups was not significant. On the
other hand, heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate decreased after the
angiography (P<0.001). This difference was only significant regarding systolic (P=0.03)
and diastolic (0.02) blood pressures and heart rate (P=0.04) of patients on the fourth 15
minutes after the angiography.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, no significant difference was
observed between the groups in terms of the effect of different types of premedication
on pain severity and hemodynamic status. Future studies are recommended to
evaluate the effect of premedication during other invasive procedures.
Keywords :
Premedication , Pain , Hemodynamic status , Coronary artery angiography
Journal title :
medical-surgical nursing journal