Title of article :
Comparing the Effects of Topical Application of Honey and Nitrofurazone Ointment on the Treatment of Second-degree Burns with Limited Area: a randomized clinical trial
Author/Authors :
Bagheri, Tooran Burn Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Fatemi, Mohammad Javad Burn Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Hosseini, Abouzar Burn Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Saberi, Mohsen Quran and Hadith Research Center - Department of Community Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Niazi, Mitra Burn Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Momeni, Mahnoush Shahid Motahari Hospital - Burn Research Center -Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Masoumi, Zahra Yaftabad Burn Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Burn is among the problems, which leads to numerous health and
financial side effects for the patients and their families. The high costs of new dressings
and burn rehabilitation have resulted in the increased tendency of researchers toward
using complementary therapies and cost-effective ingredients such as honey with
natural origin. Regarding this, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of topical
use of honey and Nitrofurazone ointment on superficial second-degree burn healing.
Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients with superficial seconddegree burns referring to Yaftabad Hospital, Tehran, Iran, during 2013-2015. The
participants were selected using the convenience sampling method, and then randomly
assigned into two groups. The wounds were dressed daily until complete wound
healing, with organic honey in one group and Nitrofurazone ointment and sterile gauze
in the other group. For the purpose of the study, the two groups were compared in
terms of such factors as pain intensity (for the first week), antibacterial activity (for the
first week), histopathological parameters (14 days later), wound healing, and wound
scar (6-12 months later). The comparisons were made through the visual analogue
scale, laboratory culture results, pathologist’s ratings, daily photographs, and
Vancouver Scar Scale, respectively. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software
version 21 by the t-test and Chi-square test.
Results: According to the results, the patients’ pain intensity gradually decreased in
both groups of honey (P<0.001) and Nitrofurazone (P<0.001) treatments and the pain
intensity results showed better improvement in the honey group. Nevertheless, there
was no significant difference between the two groups in this regard (P>0.05).
Furthermore, the two groups showed no significant differences in terms of the
epithelialization rate (P=0.52), inflammatory cells (P=0.71), vascularization (P=0.79),
repair duration (P=0.43), and scar score (P=0.28).
Conclusion: As the findings of the present study indicated, honey and Nitrofurazoneon
had comparable effects on the healing of second-degree burns (i.e., partial thickness)
with less extended area. However, further studies are needed for the replacement of
Nitrofurazone with honey.
Keywords :
Honey , Nitrofurazone , Second-degree burn
Journal title :
medical-surgical nursing journal