• Title of article

    Distribution of Stromal Cell Subsets in Cultures from Distinct Ocular Surface Compartments

  • Author/Authors

    Liu, Lei Regenerative Medicine Group - Department of Health Science and Technology - Aalborg University - Aalborg - Denmark , Yu, Ying Department of Neurosurgery - First Hospital of Jilin University - Changchun - China , Peng, Qiuyue Regenerative Medicine Group - Department of Health Science and Technology - Aalborg University - Aalborg - Denmark , Porsborg, Simone R Regenerative Medicine Group - Department of Health Science and Technology - Aalborg University - Aalborg - Denmark , Nielsen, Frederik M Regenerative Medicine Group - Department of Health Science and Technology - Aalborg University - Aalborg - Denmark , Jørgensen, Annemette Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Aalborg University Hospital - Denmark , Grove, Anni Department of Pathology - Aalborg University Hospital - Denmark , Bath, Chris Department of Ophthalmology - Aalborg University Hospital - Aalborg - Denmark , Hjortdal, Jesper Department of Ophthalmology - Aarhus University Hospital - Aarhus - Denmark , Christiansen, Ole B Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Aalborg University Hospital - Denmark , Fink, Trine Regenerative Medicine Group - Department of Health Science and Technology - Aalborg University - Aalborg - Denmark , Zachar, Vladimir Regenerative Medicine Group - Department of Health Science and Technology - Aalborg University - Aalborg - Denmark

  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    493
  • To page
    501
  • Abstract
    Purpose: To reveal the phenotypic differences between human ocular surface stromal cells (hOSSCs) cultured from the corneal, limbal, and scleral compartments. Methods: A comparative analysis of cultured hOSSCs derived from four unrelated donors was conducted by multichromatic flow cytometry for six distinct CD antigens, including the CD73, CD90, CD105, CD166, CD146, and CD34. Results: The hOSSCs, as well as the reference cells, displayed phenotypical profiles that were similar in high expression of the hallmark mesenchymal stem cell markers CD73, CD90, and CD105, and also the cancer stem cell marker CD166. Notably, there was considerable variation regarding the expression of CD34, where the highest levels were found in the corneal and scleral compartments. The multi-differentiation potential marker CD146 was also expressed highly variably, ranging from 9% to 89%, but the limbal stromal and endometrial mesenchymal stem cells significantly surpassed their counterparts within the ocular and reference groups, respectively. The use of six markers enabled investigation of 64 possible variants, however, just four variants accounted for almost 90% of all hOSSCs, with the co-expression of CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166 and a combination of CD146 and CD34. The limbal compartment appeared unique in that it displayed greatest immunophenotype diversity and harbored the highest proportion of the CD146+CD34- pericyte-like forms, but, interestingly, the pericyte-like cells were also found in the avascular cornea. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that the hOSSCs exhibit an immunophenotype consistent with that of MSCs, further highlight the phenotypical heterogeneity in stroma from distinct ocular surface compartments, and finally underscore the uniqueness of the limbal region.
  • Keywords
    CD146 , CD34 , Flow Cytometry , Human Ocular Surface Stromal Cells , Pericytes
  • Journal title
    Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research
  • Serial Year
    2020
  • Record number

    2522926