Author/Authors :
Kerman Saravi, Fatieh Community Nursing Research Center - Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Navidian, Ali Pregnancy Health Research Center - Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Ebrahimi Tabas, Ebrahim Community Nursing Research Center - Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Ghaderi, Sekineh School of Nursing and Midwifery - Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Zirak, Mehdi Departemant of Education - Islamic Azad University Branch of Torbat‐e Heydarieh, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Myocardial infarction is one of the most common types of cardiac
diseases. Considering the necessity of self-care in these patients, continuous care
model can be an appropriate framework for sensitizing patients to accept and continue
health behaviors. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effect of home-based
continuous care model on the quality of life of patients with myocardial infarction.
Methods: A semi-experimental study was conducted among MI patients who were
admitted to the cardiac care units (CCUs) of Ali ibn Abi Talib and Khatamolanbia
teaching hospitals in Zahedan, Iran. Sixty patients were selected through the
convenience sampling method, and then they were randomly allocated to two groups of
intervention and control (n=30 each). The continuous care model was implemented in
four stages of orientation, sensitization, control, and evaluation over a course of five 30
to 45-minute group sessions and through phone calls (a total of four phone calls, one
per week). On the other hand, subjects of the control groups received the routine care.
Data were collected using a demographic characteristics checklist and the Quality of
Life after Myocardial Infarction questionnaire (QLMI) designed by McNew. The
questionnaire was filled out at the three stages of before and after the sensitization and
after the third stage of the continuous model. Data analysis was performed in SPSS,
version 20, using independent t-test, Chi-square test, and repeated measures analysis
of variance (ANOVA).
Results: We found no significant difference between the intervention and control
groups regarding age, marital status, level of education, occupational status, and
duration of disease diagnosis. However, the mean scores of emotional aspect
(P=0.03), physical aspect (P=0.02), social aspect (P=0.01), and the total score (0.01) of
quality of life significantly increased in the intervention group at the end of the
sensitization stage. On the other hand, repeated measures ANOVA reflected significant
changes in the quality of life score over time (P<0.001). Moreover, a significant
difference was noted in the mean total score of quality of life after the sensitization
stage based on time and group (P=0.01).
Conclusion: According to our results, the home-based continuous care model could
change the quality of life of MI patients. Therefore, to promote the quality of life of MI
patients, we recommend incorporating this model as a community-based approach in
the health system.
Keywords :
Myocardial infarction , Quality of life , Continuous care model , Home‐based care