Title of article :
The Validity and Reliability of a low-cost handheld 3D Scanner for Use in Orthotics and Prosthetics
Author/Authors :
Farahmandi Najafabadi, Davood Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics - Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Rezaie, Mohammad Reza Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics - Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Forghany, Saeed Isfahan University of Medical Sciences -Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Isfahan
Abstract :
Background: 3D scanners are used to obtain three-dimensional (3D) shapes of
body parts, offering an alternative to conventional techniques such as casting
and a variety of potential advantages. However, 3D scanners are usually very
expensive and not affordable and accessible for most orthotists and prosthetists,
especially in developing countries. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate
the validity and reliability of a low-cost handheld and affordable 3D scanner
(3Dsystems, ‘sense’) for use in orthotics and prosthetics.
Methods: The validity and reliability of the 3D Sense scanner were assessed
through repeated scanning and measurement of the predefined circumferences
of the stumps of four transtibial amputees and 8 body cast models. Two
assessors performed digital scanning and tape measurement on two different
days, each consisting of three trials per condition/day. The reliability of the 3D
sense scanner was assessed by investigating between trials, the assessors, and
day reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. The standard error
of measurement (SEM) was also calculated to assess measurement error. The
validity of the 3D sense scanner was assessed using correlation analysis, mean
percentage error (the mean differences between scanner and tape measure), and
Bland-Altman statistics.
Results: The 3D Sense scanner provides stumps and body cast model
measurements with similar reliability to the tape measure. Reliability coefficients
for the 3D scanner are relatively high (ICC). The ICCs all are near 1.0 and
SEMs all range from 0.06 to 0.10. The 3D Sense scanner demonstrated excellent
validity. There was a significant positive correlation between the 3D scanner and
tape measure for both stumps and body cast models measurements (r>0.850;
P<0.0001). The measurement error between the 3D scanner and tape measure is
very low as indicated by mean differences close to zero.
Conclusions: This study introduces a low-cost handheld and affordable 3D
scanner, which has proven to be a valid and reliable clinical tool in orthotics
and prosthetics. This 3D scanner would have extensive and powerful clinical
applicability resulting in valid and reliable digital information of body segments
for computer-aided design (CAD) of orthotics and prosthetics.
Keywords :
Computer-aided design , Validity and reliability , Orthotic devices , Prostheses and implants
Journal title :
Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences and Research(JRSR)