Author/Authors :
Soheili, Marzieh Cellular and Molecular Research Center - Research Institute for Health Development - Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , Haji-allahverdipoor, Kaveh Department of Biotechnology and Plant Breeding - Faculty of Agriculture - Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , Khadem-erfan, Mohamad Bagher Cellular and Molecular Research Center - Research Institute for Health Development - Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , Baban, Babak Department of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences DCG - Augusta University, Augusta GA, USA , Nikkhoo, Bahram Cellular and Molecular Research Center - Research Institute for Health Development - Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , Eliasi, Anwar Department of Surgery - Faculty of Medicine - Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , Nasseri, Sherko Cellular and Molecular Research Center - Research Institute for Health Development - Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a new severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus. COVID-
19 patients are at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome and death from respiratory failure.
Methods: In this study the complete genome of the SARS-CoV-2 reference sequence, geologically isolated types, and Coronavirus
related to human diseases were compared by the Molecular Phylogenetic Maximum Likelihood method. The secondary and tertiary
structures of the main protease of SARS-CoV were defined as the most similar viruses to SARS-CoV-2, aligned with chimera
software. Therefore, considering ineffective antiviral medications used for SARS-CoV and the importance of preventing acute
respiratory distress syndrome as the main cause of mortality, 2 strategies were adopted to acquire the most effective drug combination.
Results: The results of phylogenic analysis showed that SARS-CoV is the most similar virus to SARS-CoV-2. The secondary
structure and superimposing of tertiary structure did not show a significant difference between SARS and SARS-CoV-2 3C-like main
protease and the root means square deviation between Cα atoms did not support the difference between the 2 protein structures. Thus,
these 2 mechanisms were fostered in accordance with the correlation between acute respiratory distress syndrome-related Coronavirus,
angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 on one side and the possible treatments for reducing the respiratory side effects on the other. The
analysis of renin-angiotensin system as well as the tested drugs applied to acute respiratory distress syndrome cases, indicated that
angiotensin II receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and C21 as nonpeptide agonist might possess a promising
modality of treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Furthermore, implementing recombinant human ACE2 as a competitive
receptor might be an effective way to trap and chelate the SARS-CoV-2 particles.
Conclusion: The data suggest that combination therapy of angiotensin II receptor blockers and C21 could be a potential
pharmacologic regimen to control and reduce acute respiratory distress syndrome. Moreover, rhACE2 can be recommended as an
effective protective antiviral therapy in the treatment of COVID-19 and its complications.
Keywords :
Acute respiratory distress syndrome , SARS-Associated Coronavirus , Renin-Angiotensin system , SARS-CoV-2