Author/Authors :
Najafipour, Sedigheh Department of Medical Education - Faculty of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Mortaz Hejri, Sara Department of Medical Education - Faculty of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Nikbakht Nasrabadi, Alireza Department of Nursing - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Yekaninejad, Mir Saeed Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics - School of Public Health - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Shirazi, Mandana Department of Medical Education - Faculty of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Labaf, Ali Department of Emergency Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Jalili, Mohammad Department of Emergency Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: A few studies have been done regarding the validity and reliability of the Mini-Peer Assessment Tool across various
specialties. This study was conducted to determine the reliability, content and construct validity of Mini-Peer Assessment Tool to assess
the competency of emergency medicine residents.
Methods: This study was carried out to investigate the psychometric properties of the mini-PAT tool to evaluate the professional
competencies of emergency medicine residents in educational hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The initial
Mini-Peer Assessment Tool was translated into Persian. After that, the content validity index and content validity ratio determined by
consulting 12 professors of emergency medicine. The construct validity was determined with exploratory factor analysis and
investigation of the correlation coefficient on 31 self and 248 peer assessment cases.
The reliability of the mini peer assessment tool was determined by internal consistency and item deletion by using Cronbach’s alpha
coefficient. Reliability was also assessed by determining the agreement between the two tools of self-assessment and peer assessment
by using the diagram Bland and Altman.
Results: The results showed content validity ratio (CVR) of the items ranged from 0.56 to 0.83, and the content validity index (CVI)
of the items ranged from 0.72 to 0.90. The reliability of the self-assessment and peer-assessment tools were 0.83 and 0.95 respectively
and there was a relative agreement between the self-assessment method and the peer assessment method. Finally, the tool underwent
exploratory factor analysis resulting extraction into two factors namely ‘clinical competencies’ and ‘human interactions’ in the peer
assessment tool. In the self-assessment tool, the factors of ‘good practice’ and ‘technical competence’ were extracted.
Conclusion: The results of the present study provided evidence of the adequacy of content validity, reliability of the contextually
customized mini-peer assessment tool in assessing the competencies of emergency medicine residents.