Title of article :
Does intrathecal midazolam improve hyperbaric bupivacaine–fentanyl anesthesia in elderly patients?
Author/Authors :
Ebied, Riham S. Theodor Bilharz Research Institute - Department of Anaesthesiology, Egypt , Ali, Mohamed Z. Theodor Bilharz Research Institute - Department of Anaesthesiology, Egypt , Boules, Maged L. Fayoum University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Anaesthesiology, Egypt , Samhan, Yasser M. Theodor Bilharz Research Institute - Department of Anaesthesiology, Egypt
From page :
602
To page :
607
Abstract :
ObjectiveTo assess the effect of intrathecal midazolam with bupivacaine–fentanyl in elderly patients undergoing endourologic procedures.Materials and methodsThis prospective, randomized, double-blind study involved 60 ASA physical status II-III patients aged over 60 years scheduled for elective endoscopic urologic procedures under spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg/ml). They were randomized into one of three equal groups of 20 patients each: the first group, control group (group C), received7.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in a volume of 1.5 ml; the second group, fentanyl group (group F), received 7.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in a volume of 1.5 ml and 10 μg fentanyl (0.1 ml); and the third group, fentanylmidazolam group (group FM), received 7.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in a volume of 1.5 ml and 10 μg fentanyl (0.1 ml) plus 1.0 mg of midazolam (0.2 ml). Sensory and motor effects were assessed. Postoperative pain, sedation, and adverse effects were also recorded.ResultsThe three studied groups were comparable in demographic and clinical characteristics. They were hemodynamically stable. There was no significant difference between the three groups in the onset of sensory (P = 0.721) and motor block (P = 0.342), duration of motor block (P = 0.286), and sedation score (P = 0.229). Duration of sensory block was prolonged in group F compared with the control group (P 0.001) and prolonged more in group FM compared with the F group (P = 0.065). Time to first request of rescue analgesic was significantly longer in group F compared with the C group (P = 0.033) and in FM compared with the F group (P 0.001). All patients reported excellent or good degree of satisfaction with anesthetic procedure (P = 0.547).ConclusionAdjuvant intrathecal midazolam resulted in intraoperative hemodynamic stability and safely potentiates postoperative analgesic effect of bupivacainefentanyl spinal anesthesia in elderlypatients undergoing endourologic procedures.
Keywords :
adjuvant , fentanyl , intrathecal bupivacaine , midazolam , spinal anesthesia
Journal title :
Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology(ASJA)
Journal title :
Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology(ASJA)
Record number :
2538941
Link To Document :
بازگشت