Title of article
Performance of Two Types of High Speed, High Efficiency Axisymmetric Intakes
Author/Authors
Galkin ، Vladislav School of Earth Sciences Engineering - Tomsk Polytechnic University , Fomin ، Vasily Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics - Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch , Mölder ، Sannu Ryerson University , Vnuchkov ، Dmitry Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics - Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch , Zvegintsev ، Valery Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics - Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch
From page
93
To page
101
Abstract
Performance of two axisymmetric air intakes are compared at conditions suitable for Mach number range from 2 to 8. First is the Busemann intake and second is the reversed isentropic nozzle. The isentropic nozzle is built by the method of characteristics. The contour of this nozzle is taken as a compression surface for the incoming flow. Performances of these two intakes are compared by comparison of both viscous and inviscid CFD calculations at Mach 6. Viscous flow calculations show that the total pressure recovery in compression section is 0.8316 in the Busemann intake and 0.869 in the reversed isentropic nozzle intake.
Keywords
Supersonic , Air intake , Near , isentropic compression , Total pressure recovery
Journal title
Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics
Journal title
Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics
Record number
2544393
Link To Document