Title of article
Antibody Rapid Test Results in Emergency Medical Services Personnel during COVID-19 Pandemic; a Cross Sectional Study
Author/Authors
Saberian, Peyman Pre-Hospital and Hospital Emergency Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran - Iran , Mireskandari, Mohammad Department of Anesthesiology - Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran - Iran , Baratloo, Alireza Pre-Hospital and Hospital Emergency Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran - Iran , Hasani-Sharamin, Parisa Tehran Emergency Medical Service Center - Tehran - Iran , Babaniamansour, Sepideh School of Medicine - Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences - Tehran - Iran , Aliniagerdroudbari, Ehsan School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran - Iran , Jamshididana, Mahnaz Tehran Emergency Medical Service Center - Tehran - Iran
Pages
9
From page
1
To page
9
Abstract
Introduction: Like other infectious diseases, it is expected that COVID-19 will mostly end with the development
of neutralizing antibody immunity. This study aimed to evaluate the value of COVID-19 antibody rapid test assessment in emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted
in Tehran, Iran from 20th March until 20th May 2020. The results of chest computed tomography (CT) scan,
and antibody rapid test were compared in EMS personnel with confirmed COVID-19, as well as symptomatic
and asymptomatic ones who had exposure to a probable/confirmed COVID-19 teammate. In symptomatic or
asymptomatic individuals who were only IgM-positive, chest CT scan or RT-PCR was recommended. Results: A
total of 243 EMS personnel with the mean age of 36.14±8.70 (range 21 to 59) years took part in this study (87.7%
were males). Most of the participants (73.3%) had history of exposure. One hundred sixty-three EMS personnel
were tested using either RT-PCR test or chest CT-scan or both, and 78 (47.9%) of them had at least one positive
result. Among the participants who had undergone chest CT-scan and/or RT-PCR test (n=163), 78 had positive
chest CT-scan and/or RT-PCR test; of these, 18 individuals had negative results for IgM and IgG. The rate of positive IgM and IgG in participants with positive chest CT-scan was 1.6 or 1.3 times more than those with negative
chest CT-scan, respectively (p < 0.05). The percentage of positive results for both IgM and IgG in participants
having positive RT-PCR test was 1.7 times more than those having negative RT-PCR test (p < 0.05). Conclusion:
Rapid antibody test could help in diagnosis of COVID-19 in asymptomatic or symptomatic EMS personnel who
did not undergo RT-PCR test or the test was reported as negative. However, its sensitivity could be enhanced
through use along with other diagnostic methods.
Keywords:
Keywords
Antibodies , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , COVID-19 , Reagent Kits , Diagnostic , Emergency Medical Services
Journal title
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine (AAEM)
Serial Year
2021
Record number
2544923
Link To Document