Title of article :
Common Pitfalls in the Conduct of Clinical Research
Author/Authors :
Zlowodzki, Michael McMaster University - Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Canada , Jönsson, Anders Association Internationale pour l’Ostéosynthèse Dynamique (AIOD) - Trauma Care Institute - Clinical Investigation Division, France , Bhandari, Mohit McMaster University - Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Canada , Bhandari, Mohit Association Internationale pour l’Ostéosynthèse Dynamique (AIOD) - Trauma Care Institute - Clinical Investigation Division, France
Abstract :
Recently, paradigm shift from expert opinion towards evidence-based medicine has occurred encouraging physicians to base their treatment decisions on the best available research evidence. In the hierarchy of evidence randomized clinical trials (level 1 evidence) are considered of the highest quality (least biased) while non-randomized studies represent lower levels (levels 2–4). Several pitfalls in the design and conduct of clinical research include: lack of randomization, lack of concealment, lack of blinding, and errors in hypothesis testing (type I and II errors). A basic understanding of these principles of research will empower both investigators and readers when applying the results of research to clinical practice.
Keywords :
Evidence , based medicine , Clinical research , Review , Randomized trial , Study design
Journal title :
Medical Principles and Practice
Journal title :
Medical Principles and Practice