• Title of article

    A Comparison of Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with and Without Drainage

  • Author/Authors

    Shah, Syed Fahd Federal General Hospital, pakistan , Shah, Syed Zubair Military Hospital, Pakistan , Waqar, S H Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences - Surgical Unit III, Pakistan , Malik, Zafar Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences - Surgical Unit III, Pakistan , Zahid, M A Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences - Surgical Unit III, Pakistan

  • From page
    80
  • To page
    83
  • Abstract
    Objective: Routine drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a debatable issue. This study is aimed to compare post-operative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without drainage. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery at Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Islamabad from November 2009 to April 2010. Materials and Methods: This study included 120 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Results: Females were more than males (7.5:1). The mean age in both groups was 47.2 years. Patients in the without drainage group had less postoperative pain, wound infections, fever and chest infection as compared to drainage group. Postoperatively patients in the without drainage group were mobilized early and the hospital stay was shorter as compared to the drainage group. There was no mortality in our study. Conclusion: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy without drainage is better than laparoscopic cholecystectomy with drainage.
  • Keywords
    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy , Cholelithiasis , Drains
  • Journal title
    Annals of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
  • Journal title
    Annals of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
  • Record number

    2568839