Title of article :
Evaluation of PET Scanner Performance in PET/MR and PET/CT Systems: NEMA Tests
Author/Authors :
Sönmezoğlu, Kerim İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine - Department of Nuclear Medicine - İstanbul, Turkey , Demir, Mustafa İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine - Department of Nuclear Medicine - İstanbul, Turkey , Abuqbeitah, Mohammad İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine - Department of Nuclear Medicine - İstanbul, Turkey , Yeyin, Nami İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine - Department of Nuclear Medicine - İstanbul, Turkey , Toklu, Türkay Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine - Department of Nuclear Medicine - İstanbul, Turkey , Çetin, Hüseyin Epsilon Landauer Company - İstanbul, Turkey , Sezgin, H. Sezer Epsilon Landauer Company - İstanbul, Turkey
Pages :
9
From page :
10
To page :
18
Abstract :
The aim of the present study was to compare the performance of positron emission tomography (PET) component of PET/computed tomography (CT) with new emerging PET/magnetic resonance (MR) of the same vendor. Methods: According to National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU2-07, five separate experimental tests were performed to evaluate the performance of PET scanner of General Electric GE company; SIGNATM model PET/MR and GE Discovery 710 model PET/CT. The main investigated aspects were spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction, count rate performance, image quality, count loss and random events correction accuracy. Results: The findings of this study demonstrated superior sensitivity (~ 4 folds) of PET scanner in PET/MR compared to PET/CT system. Image quality test exhibited higher contrast in PET/MR (~ 9%) compared with PET/CT. The scatter fraction of PET/MR was 43.4% at noise equivalent count rate (NECR) peak of 218 kcps and the corresponding activity concentration was 17.7 kBq/cc. Whereas the scatter fraction of PET/CT was found as 39.2% at NECR peak of 72 kcps and activity concentration of 24.3 kBq/cc. The percentage error of the random event correction accuracy was 3.4% and 3.1% in PET/MR and PET/CT, respectively. Conclusion: It was concluded that PET/MR system is about 4 times more sensitive than PET/CT, and the contrast of hot lesions in PET/MR was ~ 9% higher than PET/CT. These outcomes also emphasize the possibility to achieve excellent clinical PET images with low administered dose and/or a short acquisition time in PET/MR.
Keywords :
quality control , PET/CT , NEMA tests , PET/MR
Journal title :
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy
Serial Year :
2018
Full Text URL :
Record number :
2575019
Link To Document :
بازگشت