Title of article :
Relationship between P-Wave Dispersion and Effective Hemodialysis in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients
Author/Authors :
Ozmen, Namik Gulhane Military Training Hospital, Haydarpasa Teaching Hospital - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Cebeci, Beker Sitki Gulhane Military Training Hospital, Haydarpasa Teaching Hospital - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Kardesoglu, Ejder Gulhane Military Training Hospital, Haydarpasa Teaching Hospital - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Atasoyu, Enes Murat Gulhane Military Training Hospital, Haydarpasa Teaching Hospital - Department of Nephrology, Turkey , Unver, Suat Gulhane Military Training Hospital, Haydarpasa Teaching Hospital - Department of Nephrology, Turkey , Celik, Turgay Gulhane Military Medical Faculty - School of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Aparci, Mustafa Gulhane Military Training Hospital, Haydarpasa Teaching Hospital - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Dincturk, Mehmet Gulhane Military Training Hospital, Haydarpasa Teaching Hospital - Department of Cardiology, Turkey
From page :
147
To page :
150
Abstract :
Objective: To investigate whether or not P-wave dispersion (PWD) can be used as a good indicator of effective hemodialysis. Subjects andMethods: The study included 35 patients (20 males, 15 females, mean age 61 ± 10 years) who regularly received hemodialysis treatment for chronic renal failure. Following hemodialysis, the patients whose hemodynamic parameters were preserved and who reached dry body weight were included. Twelve-lead resting electrocardiogram (ECG) at a speed of 25–50 mm/s, the value of total body fluid (TBF) and bioelectric impedance using bipedal bioelectric impedance equipment were obtained before and immediately after hemodialysis. Blood samples were also taken for the assessment of blood electrolytes, urea and creatinine. PWD was defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum P-wave duration calculated on a standard 12-lead ECG before and after dialysis. Results: The following parameters were obtained before and after hemodialysis: blood pressure 132 ± 21 vs. 130 ± 10 mm Hg (p 0.05), TBF 33.9 ± 6 vs. 32 ± 5.6 liters (p = 0.001), impedance 499 ± 110 vs. 596 ± 136 Ω (p = 0.001), P-max 103.1 ± 8.9 vs. 106.3 ± 12.7 ms (p 0.05), P-min 70.2 ± 11 vs. 72.5 ± 7.9 ms (p 0.05), PWD 32.2 ± 11.9 vs. 33.8 ± 13.4 ms (p 0.05). Although statistically significant decreases were observed in urea and creatinine levels after hemodialysis, no such changes were observed in blood electrolytes. Conclusion: The P-max and PWD did not change significantly after hemodialysis, hence these two parameters can be used as an indicator of effective hemodialysis.
Keywords :
Hemodialysis , Dry body weight , P , wave dispersion
Journal title :
Medical Principles and Practice
Journal title :
Medical Principles and Practice
Record number :
2575470
Link To Document :
بازگشت