Title of article :
Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures
Author/Authors :
P, Raval Department of Orthopaedics - Wishaw General Hospital - Scotland, United Kingdom , A, Ramasamy Department of Orthopaedics - Wishaw General Hospital - Scotland, United Kingdom , H, Raza Department of Orthopaedics - Wishaw General Hospital - Scotland, United Kingdom , K, Khan Department of Orthopaedics - Wishaw General Hospital - Scotland, United Kingdom , N, Awan Department of Orthopaedics - Wishaw General Hospital - Scotland, United Kingdom
Abstract :
Introduction: A comparative evaluation of the surgical treatment and outcome of patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated with short versus long proximal femoral nail antirotation.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review was
conducted of patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated
between January 2011 and June 2012. In all 80 patients were
enrolled in the study, of which 40 were treated with short
PFNA and the remaining with long PFNA. Comparative
analyses of demographic data, peri-operative outcome and
complications were carried out.
Results: There was no significant difference noted in the two
groups with regards to Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur
Osteosynthesefragen (AO) fracture classification, time from
injury to surgery, blood transfusion post surgery and hospital
stay. The surgical duration for a short PFNA procedure was
significantly less (58 minutes) when compared to that of a
long PFNA (87 minutes). Similarly intra-operative blood
loss was significantly higher in the long PFNA group as
compared to the short PFNA. Conclusions: A relatively quicker surgical time of just under
an hour , lesser blood loss and better learning curve with
trainee surgeons make short PFNA a better implant choice in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures.
Keywords :
Pertrochanteric fractures , Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation , Short , Long , Intramedullary fixation
Journal title :
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal