• Title of article

    New System for the Classification of Epiphyseal Separation of theCoracoid Process: Evaluation of Nine Cases and Review ofthe Literature

  • Author/Authors

    Mondori, Takamitsu Department of Orthopaedics - Uda City Hospital - Nara Shoulder & Elbow Center - 815 Hagiwara - Haibara, Japan , Nakagawa, Yoshiyuki Department of Orthopaedics - Uda City Hospital - Nara Shoulder & Elbow Center - 815 Hagiwara - Haibara, Japan , Kurata,Shimpei Department of Orthopaedics - Nara Medical University - 840 Shijyo - Kashihara, Japan , Inoue, Kazuya Department of Orthopaedics - Nara Medical University - 840 Shijyo - Kashihara, Japan , Tanaka, Yasuhito Department of Orthopaedics - Nara Medical University - 840 Shijyo - Kashihara, Japan , Fujii, Shuhei Department of Orthopaedics - Nara Prefecture Seiwa Medical Center - 1-14-16 Mimuro - Sangou-cho - Ikoma-gun,Nara, Japan , Egawa, Takuya Department of Orthopaedics - Okanami General Hospital - 1734 Ueno Kuwamachi, Japan

  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    1
  • To page
    9
  • Abstract
    Epiphyseal separation of the coracoid process (CP) rarely occurs in adolescents. In this retrospective caseseries, we reviewed the data of nine patients treated at our center and those of 28 patients reported in the literature. )is injury canbe classified into three types according to the injured area: Type I, base including the area above the glenoid; Type II, centerincluding the coracoclavicular ligament (CCL); and Type III, tip with the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis, as well asthe pectoralis minor.Patients/Participants. A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. Data on sex, age, cause andmechanism of injury, separation type, concomitant injury around the shoulder girdle, treatment, and functional outcomes wereobtained.Main Outcome Measurements and Results. Type I is the most common type. )e cause of injury and associated injuryaround the shoulder girdle were significantly different between Type I, II, and III fractures. )e associated acromioclavicular (AC)dislocation and treatment were significantly different between Type I and III fractures. Our new classification system reflects theclinical features, imaging findings, and surgical management of epiphyseal separation of the CP. Type I and II fractures are mostlyassociated with AC dislocation and have an associated injury around the shoulder girdle. Type III fractures are typically caused byforceful resisted flexion of the arm and elbow. Although the latter are best managed surgically, whether conservative or surgicalmanagement is optimal for Type I and II fractures remains controversial.Conclusions. We noted some differences in the clinicalcharacteristics depending on the location of injury; therefore, we aimed to examine these differences to develop a new system forclassifying epiphyseal separation of the CP. )is would increase the clinicians’ awareness regarding this injury and lead to thedevelopment of an appropriate treatment.
  • Keywords
    New System , Classification , Epiphyseal Separation , Coracoid Process , Evaluation of Nine Cases , Review ofthe Literature
  • Journal title
    Advances in Orthopedics
  • Serial Year
    2020
  • Record number

    2604948