Author/Authors :
PK, Majumdar Department of Orthopaedics - Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences - Rohtak - India , RK, Gupta Department of Orthopaedics - Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences - Rohtak - India
Abstract :
We are used to invisible enemies in our practice but this time it is different. We may be the victims this time, like other orthopaedic surgeons around the world, along with our
patients, despite meticulous precautions. In these testing
times, as we enter phase III of the coronavirus pandemic in
India, we are faced with difficult decisions to make regarding
the surgeries to perform and those to defer
1,2
.
The fear of asymptomatic carriers in patients and colleagues
should not weigh on the decision to operate but should be
evaluated by the urgency of the procedure; existing and
anticipated COVID-19 cases in the hospital and region;
availability of PPE, beds and staff; and finally, age and health
of the patient.
What constitutes elective surgery? The traditional elective
surgeries like arthroscopy and arthroplasty are obvious nobrainers but what about trauma? Are all fresh fractures
emergencies or only life and limb saving surgeries? This is
tight rope walking for surgeons. In times where several hospitals have started taking special
‘Corona consent’, do we save ourselves and hopefully
patients’lives now and manage complications like non-union
or malunion later
3
? How about our relatives and patients with
whom we have a long-standing or good relationship with?
How do we turn them down? The tough task of decision
making should be a collective effort after discussion of each
case and cannot be just put into one category or other.
Luckily the lockdown imposed by the government has
considerably decreased the number of trauma patients but on
the flip side, being in an apex institute means every case gets
referred to us from the smaller hospitals/nursing homes that
have closed doors to patients they usually cater to otherwise.
In our humble opinion, upper limb surgeries take a back seat
especially clavicle, scapula, diaphyseal upper limb as well as non-dominant hand fractures. Femur fractures need to be
addressed while patella, leg, foot and non-life-saving pelviacetabular surgeries may be delayed or managed
conservatively. Spine fractures may be managed
conservatively if cauda equina symptoms or significant
deficit is not present. Pediatric and congenital deformity
surgeries may be postponed whereas, malignancies, tendon
injuries, amputations, acute infections and abscesses of
bones or joints, periarticular fractures and periprosthetic
lower limb fractures may not wait. Outpatient visits may be
restricted to recent postoperative patients only.
Senior surgeons or those with co-morbidities may minimise
patient interaction especially in operation theatres and allow
essential surgeries to be performed by younger surgeons. The
lockdown has thrown outpatients into disarray as public
transport is not available and most times, no direct telephone
access to orthopaedic surgeons may be possible in certain
situations. Those with plaster or acrylic casts on, well
beyond two months, have no way to cut them at home and no
means to reach the hospital. There are many questions, yet few answers. In the end it is an occupational hazard that we have to live with.