Author/Authors :
Saar, Katri South Savo Social and Health Care and Authority, Finland , Nyrkkö, Hannu Kruunupuisto Punkaharju Rehabilitation Center, Finland , Tolvanen, Asko University of Jyväskylä - Department of Psychology, Finland , Kuikka, Pekka Neuroarviot Ltd., Finland , Poutiainen, Erja Rehabilitation Foundation, Finland , Aro, Tuija University of Jyväskylä - Department of Psychology, Finland
Abstract :
Objective. Two million adults under fifty years of age have a cerebral stroke every year worldwide. Neuropsychological assessment is
the best way to identify poststroke cognitive dysfunction, but it is often time-consuming and can be tiring for the patient, and
hospitals vary in their availability of neuropsychological expertise. A valid and reliable cognitive screening method could be
advantageous in identifying patients who need comprehensive neuropsychological examination. Our purpose in this study was
to validate a newly developed cognitive screening method as an identifier of cognitive dysfunction after stroke in working-aged
patients. Methods. We analyzed new cognitive screening method concurrent validity by comparing it in two groups formed on
the basis of a comprehensive neuropsychological examination for 77 stroke patients. We identified the best balance of sensitivity
and specificity by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and investigated the impact of the sociodemographic
variables to the screening method total score variation. Results. We found a significant correlation between the method’s total
score and performance in neuropsychological examination. The cognitive method’s internal consistency was strong; Cronbach’s
alpha for all items was .818. The best balance of sensitivity (88%) and specificity (50%) was found at a total score cut point of
138. Subjects’ age and length of education were each responsible for 10% of total score variation. Conclusions. This study shows
promising results for this new cognitive screening tool’s ability to identify poststroke cognitive decline and patients’ need for
further detailed neuropsychological examination.