Title of article :
Forecasting Daily Volume and Acuity of Patients in the Emergency Department
Author/Authors :
Calegari, Rafael Department of Industrial and Transportation Engineering - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Brazil , Fogliatto, Flavio S Department of Industrial and Transportation Engineering - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Brazil , Lucini, Filipe R Department of Industrial and Transportation Engineering - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Brazil , Neyeloff, Jeruza Hospital de Cl´ınicas de Porto Alegre - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Brazil , Kuchenbecker, Ricardo S Emergency Department - Hospital de Cl´ınicas de Porto Alegre - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Brazil , Schaan, Beatriz D Hospital de Cl´ınicas de Porto Alegre - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Brazil
Abstract :
This study aimed at analyzing the performance of four forecasting models in predicting the demand for medical care in terms of
daily visits in an emergency department (ED) that handles high complexity cases, testing the influence of climatic and calendrical
factors on demand behavior. We tested different mathematical models to forecast ED daily visits at Hospital de Cl´ınicas de Porto
Alegre (HCPA), which is a tertiary care teaching hospital located in Southern Brazil. Model accuracy was evaluated using mean
absolute percentage error (MAPE), considering forecasting horizons of 1, 7, 14, 21, and 30 days.The demand time series was stratified
according to patient classification using the Manchester Triage System’s (MTS) criteria. Models tested were the simple seasonal
exponential smoothing (SS), seasonal multiplicative Holt-Winters (SMHW), seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average
(SARIMA), and multivariate autoregressive integrated moving average (MSARIMA). Performance of models varied according to
patient classification, such that SS was the best choice when all types of patients were jointly considered, and SARIMA was the most
accurate for modeling demands of very urgent (VU) and urgent (U) patients. The MSARIMA models taking into account climatic
factors did not improve the performance of the SARIMA models, independent of patient classification.
Keywords :
ED , MTS , MSARIMA , Models
Journal title :
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine