Author/Authors :
Hsuan Huang, Ling Department of Emergency Medicine - Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkou Medical Center - Taoyuan - Taiwan - College of Medicine - Chang Gung University - Taoyuan - Taiwan , Ho, Yu-Ni Department of Emergency Medicine - Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Chang Gung University College of Medicine - Kaohsiung - Taiwan , Tsai, Ming-Ta Department of Emergency Medicine - Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Chang Gung University College of Medicine - Kaohsiung - Taiwan , Wu, Wei-Ting Department of Emergency Medicine - Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Chang Gung University College of Medicine - Kaohsiung - Taiwan , Cheng, Fu-Jen Department of Emergency Medicine - Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Chang Gung University College of Medicine - Kaohsiung - Taiwan
Abstract :
Ambulance response time is a prognostic factor for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the impact of ambulance response time under different situations remains unclear. We evaluated the threshold of ambulance response time for predicting survival to hospital discharge for patients with OHCA. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted using the emergency medical
service (EMS) database (January 2015 to December 2019). Prehospital factors, underlying diseases, and OHCA outcomes were
assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with Youden Index was performed to calculate optimal cut-off
values for ambulance response time that predicted survival to hospital discharge. In all, 6742 cases of adult OHCA were analyzed.
After adjustment for confounding factors, age (odds ratio [OR] � 0.983, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.975–0.992, p < 0.001),
witness (OR � 3.022, 95% CI: 2.014–4.534, p < 0.001), public location (OR � 2.797, 95% CI: 2.062–3.793, p < 0.001), bystander
cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, or � 1.363, 95% CI: 1.009–1.841, p � 0.044), EMT-paramedic response (EMT-P,
or � 1.713, 95% CI: 1.282–2.290, p < 0.001), and prehospital defibrillation using an automated external defibrillator ([AED]
or � 3.984, 95% CI: 2.920–5.435, p < 0.001) were statistically and significantly associated with survival to hospital discharge. -e
cut-off value was 6.2 min. If the location of OHCA was a public place or bystander CPR was provided, the threshold was prolonged
to 7.2 min and 6.3 min, respectively. In the absence of a witness, EMT-P, or AED, the threshold was reduced to 4.2, 5, and 5 min,
respectively. -e adjusted or of EMS response time for survival to hospital discharge was 1.217 (per minute shorter, CI: 1.140–1299, p < 0.001) and 1.992 (<6.2 min, 95% CI: 1.496–2.653, p < 0.001). -e optimal response time threshold for survival to
hospital discharge was 6.2 min. In the case of OHCA in public areas or with bystander CPR, the threshold was prolonged, and without witness, the optimal response time threshold was shortened.
Keywords :
emergency medical service (EMS) , Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) , OHCA , Response Time Threshold , Predicting Outcomes , Patients , Hospital Cardiac Arrest